|
ASHRAE Technical Committee
7.9 - Building Commissioning
SEMINAR PRESENTATIONS
Important Notice: This information
available below was presented at ASHRAE Seminars. The seminar
format is to present information of current interest and to
provide a venue for interaction between ASHRAE members. These
seminars should not be considered peer-reviewed (or the final
word on any subject). Neither ASHRAE nor the Technical Committee
(TC) has investigated, and both ASHRAE and the TC expressly
disclaim any duty to investigate any product, service, procedure,
design, or the like that may be described herein. The appearance
of any technical data or editorial material in this presentation
does not constitute endorsement, warranty, or guaranty by
ASHRAE or the TC of any product, service, process, procedure,
design, or the like. ASHRAE, the TC, the authors, and their
employers do not warrant that the information in this presentation
is free of errors. The user assumes the entire risk of the
use of any information in this presentation. Before making
any decision or taking any action on this subject, you should
consult a qualified professional advisor.
Since 2005, ASHRAE has been selling DVDs of seminar presentations.
The DVDs contain not only the presentation slides,
but also capture the audio of the presenters and in most cases
the audience members who asked questions, as well as the cursor
movements as the presenter pointed to different parts of the
slides. If you find the slide decks below interesting, we
strongly suggest that you consider ordering the DVD from the
ASHRAE's
bookstore.
|
Chicago Meeting (January, 2006)
Orlando Meeting
(February, 2005)
Honolulu Meeting (June, 2002)
Programs for the Chicago Meeting
(January, 2006):
|
Seminar 6
Sunday, January 22, 8:00-10:00 AM
Preventing Train Wrecks in Under Floor Air
Distribution Systems through Commissioning
Sponsor: TC 07.09 Building Commissioning
Chair: Karl Stum, P.E., Member, SBE, Vancouver,
WA
SPC Liaison: Jitendra B. Singh, P.E., Member,
J & P Engineers, Linwood, NJ
Too often, under-floor air distribution projects
have unclear requirements for contractors, resulting
in coordination and scheduling problems, as well
as maintaining specified floor pressure problems.
This session addresses how commissioning during
design, construction, balance and functional testing
can mitigate these issues.
1. Design Review and Specification Issues
for UFAD
Carl N. Lawson, Member, Systems Solutions Consultants,
Zephyrhills, FL
2. Trade Coordination and Field Observation
Issues for UFAD
Scott Nelson, P.E., Member, CH2MHILL, Portland,
OR
3. Air and Water Balancing Issues for UFAD
Gaylon Richardson, Member, Engineered Air Balance,
Houston, TX
4. Functional
Testing of UFAD
Larry Luskay, P.E., Member, PECI, Portland, OR
|
Presentations at the Orlando
Meeting (February, 2005):
|
Seminar 6
Sunday, February 6, 8:00-10:00 AM
Training of Commissioning Authorities
Sponsor: TC 07.09 Building Commissioning
Chair: Gerald J. Kettler, P.E., Member, Air
Engineering and Testing, Inc., Dallas, TX
APC Liaison: Jeff J. Traylor, Member, PWI
Consulting Engineering, Durham, NC
The emergence and rapid growth of the commissioning
process has strained available practitioners and
caused a need for training programs for both new
commissioning authorities and users of commissioning.
This seminar discusses programs and options for
this training.
1. Training for Commissioning Practitioners
Richard B. Casault, P.E., Member, Casault Engineering,
Seattle, WA
2. Retro-Commissioning
Training
Charles H. Culp III, Ph.D., P.E., Member, Texas
A&M University, College Station, TX
3. Training for Field Operations for Commissioning
Andrew P. Nolfo, P.E., Member, National Environmental
Balance Bureau, Sun City West, AZ
4. Owner’s Expectations for Commissioning
Training
Jeff J. Traylor, Member, PWI Consulting Engineers,
Durham, NC
|
|
Seminar 54
Wednesday, February 9, 10:15 AM - 12:15PM
How to Comply With ASHRAE 62.1-2004
Sponsor: SSPC 62.1; TC 07.09 Building
Commissioning
Chair: Eli Howard, Member, SMACNA, Chantilly,
VA
APC Liaison: Mohammad H. Hosni, Ph.D.,
Fellow, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
ASHRAE 62.1-2004, Ventilation for Acceptable
Indoor Air Quality, contains many changes from
the 2001 standard. The new standard incorporates
more than 15 approved addenda. The methodology
for calculating ventilation rates for buildings
is fundamentally changed for the first time in
15 years. The standard also contains new requirements
for building components and building systems.
This session gives an overview of the requirements
of the 2004 standard with emphasis on the new
requirements.
1. Introduction
and Overview
Andy Persily, Ph.D., Fellow, National Institute
of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD
2. Ventilation
Rate Procedure
Lynn G. Bellenger, P.E., Fellow, Pathfinder Engineers
LLP, Pittsford, NY
3. Multiple-Zone
Systems and Other Adjustments
Dennis A. Stanke, Member, Trane, La Crosse, WI
4. Equipment and Building Requirements
Hoy R. Bohanon, P.E., Member, Bohanon Engineering,
PLLC, Clemmons, NC
|
Presentations at the Honolulu
Meeting (June, 2002):
|
Symposium HI-02-20
Wednesday, June 26, 10:15 AM - 12:15 PM
Building Commissioning Begins with Design
Intent
Sponsor:TC 09.09 Building Commissioning
Chair: Walter
Grondzik, P.E., Member, Florida A&M University,
Tallahassee, Florida
Recent efforts to update and revise ASHRAE Guideline
1, HVAC Commissioning Process, have underscored
the critical and fundamental role that clearly
defined and documented des ign intent plays in
a successful commissioning outcome. This symposium
presents several views on how design intent may
be obtained, documented, used and connected to
other aspects of the design and commissioning
process. The relationship of design intent to
terms such as "program," "project requirements"
and "basis of design" is explored. Building commissioning
truly begins with design intent.
1. Design Intent and Basis of Design: Clarification
of Terms, Structure and Use
Karl Stum, P.E., Member, CH2M HILL, Portland,
OR
2. Developing
Owner's Project Requirements During Pre-Design
Chad B. Dorgan, P.E., Member, Farnsworth Group
Inc., Madison, WI
3. The
Responsibilities of the Owner in Defining Design
Intent
Tim Corbett, P.E., Member, Social Security Administration,
Baltimore, MD
4. Design
Intent from the Design Team's Perspective
John P. Castelvecchi, Member, Shultz and James,
Inc., Mechanicsville, VA
5. Early
Energy Performance for a Green Academic Building
John
Scofield, Associate Member, Oberlin College,
Oberlin, OH
|
|
Program
Chair:
Richard Rose
Mechanical Technology
Inc.
eMail: Richard
Rose (richr@mticontrols.com)
|
|
